Charlie Kirk was spot-on to mix his politics with his faith

Introduction

Charlie Kirk was not just a political issue debater. He was also, and foremost, a proclaimer of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  He was passionate about sharing his faith, and I believe, that was the biggest issue that his opponents could not tolerate.  Truth always strikes deep into the soul.

Christianity and Politics

First of all, Christianity and politics can not be separated. To say that a person cannot carry their standards, values, and principles into the office they serve is irrational and unreasonable. The "separation of church and state" was never intended to demand one to leave morality and common sense at the door when entering into the halls of government or education. Rather, the constitution was drawn in an effort to keep the state from dictating religion or beliefs. Unfortunately the forefathers did not foresee the twisted interpretation that has come to play today, resulting in just the opposite of their original intention.  Before you raise an objection to this claim, realize that religion is nothing more than a set of principles and beliefs which define a lifestyle or world view. Atheism, therefore, is just as much a religion as Buddhism, Mormonism, or Christianity. This should open your eyes to the deception—Since the 1960's, the government has placed their endorsement time and again on Secular Humanism (because this belief system tolerates just about anything anybody would want to do).  Through various types of legislation, or our public education system, and our judicial system, it has emphatically declared that those beliefs and principles are what is necessary to be politically correct. Any system that diametrically opposes Secular Humanism (such as Christianity) must therefore be censured or banned. Ripping the moral fabric from the elected officials who do have a Christian heritage is both foolish and ultimately destructive, not to mention unconstitutional.

Secondly, the "Declaration of Independence" is grounded in the precepts of Christianity. In this founding document, our inalienable rights are granted by "The Creator." Without this authoritative statement, the document crumbles to meaningless dust and rights becomes a mythological wish list. The inferred "Creator" was clearly and unquestionably the God from the Bible. These forefathers that penned this document were not all Christian individuals.  Some were agnostics and some were even Humanists, but they all recognized the importance of having a definitive absolute set of morals and precepts.  This premise defines who we are as a nation. It grants freedom to the nation's masses by an authority that transcends the government.

Finally, these standards have to be absolute and unchangeable. To base a system of government on principles that bend and sway to the waves of public opinion, or in the case of today, a loud, and demanding minority, is as illogical as building a sand castle near the water while the tide is out.  Eventually, the constructive efforts will be destroyed as the waves swing back the other way.  Our founding fathers knew this.  That is why they chose Biblical standards and moral absolutes as the basis for this nation's development.  An authoritative book that could stand over several millennia with no compromise, no change of any kind, and empirical inherency in its preservation was the best choice then, and the best choice now for such a foundation.

Conclusion 

To suppress and remove Christianity from the hearts and minds of our government leadership damages, maybe fatally, the very soul of the nation. Do not make the mistake of thinking that the government should dictate "absence of religion" anymore than it should dictate a specific religion.  The government is suppose to be made up of the people it represents, and the current majority is based on the Biblical truths of our foundation. This majority transcends race, financial status, or any other way you want to classify people. Charlie Kirk knew that, and that is why he entertained dialog no matter who you were or what your background was.  He knew that the foundation of the nation he loved came from an authority that was bigger and better than anything a governing body could achieve.  He knew if he could spread and share this conviction, that this nation would return to the united, compassionate, and prosperous potential that has always been there. He called for us to get back to the basics, back to the original Constitution, back to God. With the current leadership in this nation, we have an unprecedented opportunity to carry Charlie's legacy onward. We need to educate and endorse measures that will return us to our roots.  Above all, we need to make sure that the government does not return to the authoritarian socialistic path it was spiraling into. We can do this by exercising our right to decide the leadership, or rather, servants of the people that are put in office and keeping the lines of communication open for everyone and to everyone.

TAGS: #CharlieKirk, #FreeSpeech, #Christianity, #Religion 

The Left’s Double Standard: Labeling Conservatives Haters While Fueling Division

 Introduction

They call conservatives “haters” and “inciters,” but when Charlie Kirk, a 31-year-old patriot, was gunned down on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University, the left’s response showed their true colors. Social media posts mocked his death, with one viral X post racking up 12 million views for joking about his pro-gun stance. This isn’t just hypocrisy—it’s a dangerous pattern. The same voices condemning Kirk’s passion for free speech and American values as “divisive” stayed silent or sneered when violence struck. Here’s how the left’s double standards are tearing at free speech and fanning the flames they claim to fight.

The Left’s Playbook: Smear, Silence, Celebrate

• Labeling Conservatives: Kirk was smeared as a bigot for challenging progressive icons like Martin Luther King Jr. or calling out trans ideology. Yet the left’s own rhetoric—like branding conservatives “Nazis” or “extremists”—goes unchecked. Trump called this out, saying such language fuels “terrorism” like Kirk’s killing.

• Free Speech Under Fire: Kirk’s Turning Point USA fought for open debate, but platforms like YouTube and Twitter throttled his reach. Now, posts mocking his death thrive on X, while conservatives get flagged for less. This selective outrage proves the left doesn’t want dialogue—they want control. They cry foul whenever they do not think their voice is heard, yet they make every effort to silence and censor anyone who disagrees with them—even by killing them.

• Celebrating Violence: X posts with millions of views laughed at Kirk’s shooting, tying it to his gun views. Where’s the condemnation from the same leftists who cry “hate speech”? Their silence—or glee—exposes a prejudice that’s anything but tolerant—it is down right evil. Not to mention the total insensitive attitude to the wife and two small children that were left behind.

Charlie Kirk’s Legacy: Patriotism, Passion, Patience

• Patriotism: Kirk rallied for a Christian, America-first vision, unapologetically pro-Second Amendment, pro-Trump and pro-Constitution. His American Comeback Tour was about restoring values and the foundation of the republic this nation was founded upon, not division.

• Passion: From campus debates to X posts, he spoke fearlessly, even under death threats. He called out hypocrisy, like the left’s selective grief over certain victims. He exposed the double-standard and controlling ideology of the left with common sense and logic. He asked the questions that no one else wants to ask, thus exposing the hollow and empty substance of the socialist agenda.

• Patience: Kirk engaged critics, hosting debates despite push-back. He let others have their time before replying with his eloquent and brilliant response. His assassination, during a public event, shows the left’s refusal to reciprocate that openness. They would rather just ultimately silence the competition rather than work towards an understanding and peaceful dialog within the law.

The Communist Shadow

The left’s tactics—silencing dissent, weaponizing labels, ignoring their own hate—mirror authoritarian playbooks like Lenin, Stalin, and Kim Jong Un. Kirk warned of this, pointing to “Islam as a sword” or cultural revolutions and socialism as threats to freedom. When a movement excuses violence against its opponents, it’s not progress—it’s control and suppression, dressed up as justice.

Call to Action

Charlie Kirk’s death isn’t just a tragedy; it’s a wake-up call. We can’t let the left rewrite his story as a “hater” while they dodge accountability. The evidence shows that this assassination was premeditated and intentional. There was even a book published on Amazon one day before the shooting entitled “The Shooting of Charlie Kirk”. Do not be deluded. The socialistic left is coming for all outspoken freedom proponents. Share this post on X, join republiclost.com, and keep the fight for free speech alive. Use hashtags like #CharlieKirk and #FreeSpeech. Let’s honor Kirk’s patriotism with facts, not fear. Let’s keep his passion for what made this country great alive. And above all, let’s show the patience and fortitude that he showed by not stooping to the tactics of those who fear the truth.